Arkansas AG Griffin chimes in on lawsuit over California gun management legislation

Arkansas Lawyer Basic Tim Griffin is constant his predecessor’s custom of hopping on board friend-of-the-court briefs in politically charged instances involving different states. However then, he’s acquired a variety of firm.

“I’ve joined 23 AGs asking the ninth Circuit to affirm a decrease court docket’s ruling tossing out a California legislation that might make handgun possession practically unattainable,” Griffin introduced at this time in a tweet. “The Second Modification nonetheless applies—even in California.”

The Second Modification nonetheless applies—even in California. I’ve joined 23 AGs asking the ninth Circuit to affirm a decrease court docket’s ruling tossing out a California legislation that might make handgun possession practically unattainable. https://t.co/esIhUf627m #arnews pic.twitter.com/cWBFvLxS6q

— Lawyer Basic Tim Griffin (@AGTimGriffin) July 6, 2023

The phrasing right here is odd — the California legislation “would” make handgun possession practically unattainable? Does Griffin know the statute in query was passed in 2001 and took full effect a decade ago? What’s modified lately just isn’t California legislation however the U.S. Supreme Court docket, which final 12 months struck down a New York statute that positioned tight restrictions on weapons carried outdoors the house.

Within the wake of that call, foes of gun management throughout the nation are desirous to problem different legal guidelines and see simply how far the court docket’s conservative majority is prepared to go in proscribing the flexibility of states to position sane limits on gun possession and utilization.

The California legislation, the Unsafe Handgun Act, requires new semiautomatic handguns to have sure onerous security options, together with the flexibility to “microstamp” a serial quantity onto bullets. No weapons at the moment manufactured meet all of the state’s guidelines, the plaintiffs declare, that means California residents are successfully restricted to purchasing older fashions. A federal judge in Los Angeles sided with the plaintiffs in March and blocked enforcement of the legislation; California’s lawyer basic has appealed to the ninth Circuit.

Griffin and a bevy of different red-state attorneys basic filed an amicus brief over the weekend in assist of the plaintiffs. “Much less liberty in California means much less liberty for all People. Amici States, thus, have a eager curiosity to nip such incursions within the bud,” it says. (An amicus, or “buddy of the court docket,” transient is filed by a celebration looking for to supply an opinion or experience in a case with out looking for to affix it.)

What about states’ rights? Not on this case, the AGs say — the Second Modification is solely inviolable. “A citizen’s skill to train his constitutional rights ‘needs to be uniform all through the nation,’” the transient says, quoting an earlier case.

In different phrases, if states need to shield their residents from getting shot, too unhealthy. Greatest to remain targeted on the real perils out there.

The submit Arkansas AG Griffin chimes in on lawsuit over California gun control law appeared first on Arkansas Times.